Mr. Chairman, it would be inconceivable to think that they don't see pitfalls. It's not that we're designing a new creature. What we're doing is basically tinkering with the language of an organization that has been around for 30 years. Successive governments of Canada in the past have expressed their frustrations with NAFO, and the very frustrations that successive governments and ministers have expressed over NAFO in the past are basically the frustrations that remain, certainly for me, in large measure.
So it's not that I'm thinking any differently, I don't believe, than other people who have worked on the NAFO file.