I love this question.
Harbour authorities are independent organizations. We have within that structure the ability to set our rates. I would really question the fact that it's not working. Our revenues were $11 million ten years ago. Today, a conservative estimate puts them at $24 million. We believe that number is much higher. We've asked small craft harbours to do a study on what that number is, because we believe it to be significantly higher. The fact is that in those ten years we have done our job. We've found different sources of revenue. We've managed to raise our revenue base to the small craft harbours program by 250%, so I would question that we need to look for new sources.
We're getting to a point now where all our structures are full, so at some point you're going to see a levelling off of what we can do outside of raising rates. But you have to remember, if you look in the Pacific region, that the average crew share for a fisherman is less than $20,000. That's poverty level. You can't expect people to pay.... The expression right across the coast is that it all comes out of the caught end. It doesn't matter if you raise the rates. It is either coming out of one pocket or it's coming out of the other pocket. These are fishermen. If you look at those 5,000 volunteers, they are fishermen. There are fishermen on these boards of harbour authorities. They are running these harbour authorities. The fact that in ten years these fishermen, these harbour authorities, have been able to raise their revenues by 250% suggests to me that we've done our job. We are doing our job.