First, thanks for coming. I'll pass on my compliments as well for the work that all of you do.
I had a question about derelict vessels. I thank you for answering the question. I discovered the size of the issue and how complicated it was a little over a year ago when we travelled to British Columbia, only to come back to Newfoundland and Labrador to find much of the same thing happening there. That too is starting to multiply.
One of the big messages we got out of it was that the boats are not getting any smaller—they're getting much bigger and this is becoming a problem. When you formulate some of this stuff, it seems like a lot of it is based on the amount of harvesters within each wharf, but they don't take into account the size of the vessels. Someone brought up the change in rules for the bigger vessels.
My question pertains to funding. As Mr. MacAulay pointed out earlier, you are the ones who walk on the wharves. Sometimes you're expected to walk on water, and that's not easy to do. Outside the government funding, the A-base budgeting, how has it changed in the past few years with respect to revenue and the fees you charge? That's a difference, too. Some provinces charge more and some charge much less. It depends on the market. How is it that the model you have right now is not working? Of course, I include not just recreation, but primarily landings and that sort of thing.