In the NAFO convention. If you're a party to that convention and there's some measure adopted, it applies to you by obligation if you don't object or if you don't go through objection procedures and disputes. If it applies to you, if you accept it, it comes into your management of those high-seas fisheries automatically.
So when we adopted a measure such as the 2006 changes to the conservation enforcement measures, they were obliged to follow it. It applies to them once it is adopted. We don't need to ask their permission. We don't need to have them ask us. We don't have any of that going on. Once it's passed, it applies to those parties in the NAFO regulatory area.
The only quid pro quo here was that if Canada so desired and asked, and if Canada accepted and voted yes to a measure, it could apply inside the zone, but it's certainly not going to apply.... We're not going to ask for anything in the NAFO convention area in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.
Also, I'm not quite sure when a minister or negotiator would be so inclined as to make these requests and have it apply, but clearly any party to NAFO has the obligation to follow the decisions of NAFO in the NAFO regulatory area. That's in there. In reality, it's the same as—