I've got to be quite frank that we aren't putting much weight on international observer reports at this point. We're relying on data from satellite systems, air surveillance, observed tows by fishery officers, and extrapolation of those tows based on days on ground. We have a very clear idea of where they're fishing, and we know how much their catch per unit effort is, so we have those as a way of estimating catch. We compare known catches from high-compliance vessels, such as the one Japanese vessel, to their counterparts from other countries. We use a number of checks and balances to get very clear understanding of the catch.
We also are inspecting vessels that land in Canada. And, as you're hearing, we can be involved in vessels landing in Spain, for example.
So all of those are used to estimate catch, and the observer reports have been fundamentally switched for more scientific-based information, and we aren't using them in terms of compliance to the extent we used to.