The opt-out is only if people are going to look at the most obstructive way to interpret the convention and to behave in a way that's inconsistent with their obligations under current international law.
While you can say that there's a potential there, the reality is that this would be a significant departure from current practices and current expectations. Also, they have to sell their fish somewhere, and the provisions that are being implemented are going to make selling fish that are coming out of those kinds of actions much more difficult.
With respect to the new convention, clearly any decision that's reached by NAFO applies in the NAFO regulatory area. Canada is a party to those decisions, and while there could be a decision reached by vote, if we are reaching a consensus decision, as we have been for the last number of years, then Canada is a part of that and is influencing the outcome of those decisions that apply to all the parties fishing in the NAFO regulatory area.