Okay.
I'm trying to clearly comprehend Mr. Byrne's suggestion and your response. In law you can't give up what you don't have. I think Mr. Byrne was asking why we can't have some reciprocal provision that would extend beyond the 200-mile limit. I don't think there's any authority in NAFO or anyone else under international law to allow any country to extend its reach beyond that 200-mile limit. Isn't that correct?