So from what I understood in this very interesting arrangement, there is a reliance on the host state to enforce NAFO rules against the host state's own member. In this case you mentioned—the 200,000 euro fine—Spain imposed that fine against Spanish interests. What is the incentive for the host countries to act against their own people? I would think it would be politically very unpopular, even though it may be legally required. What is the incentive for countries to do that?
