I would like to make one comment, Mr. Chair.
Are we more effective because there are fewer fish, less plentiful resources?
It is an unfortunate thing to realize, on the one hand. On the other hand, we do have an interest and that is obvious. We know that fish, the resource, has no boundaries. Unfortunately, if the past is any indication of the future, we know that some countries—Russia, Spain, Japan etc., not to mention any names—are capable of doing almost anything when it comes to the resource.
What can we do to avoid the ineffectiveness of the past becoming in the end the modus operandi of NAFO?