Isn't that a difference in the NAFO convention, that there will be flag-state enforcement against the vessels of the flag state, and that's why, in the example that was used by Dr. Bevan, it was $200,000 euros against a Spanish vessel in 2006, and then in 2007 there were no infractions at all? That suggests that in fact we're actually going in a way that will achieve that priority of protecting our fish stocks.
On March 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.