That's a tough question.
I think it ebbs and flows over time. I agree with the comments that Mr. Applebaum and Mr. Parsons made last week—I forget who, but I think it was Mr. Applebaum—that there were signs these countries were cleaning up their act after the turbot war. But over time, the reverberations of that bullet died down, and they started to slip back into their old ways. By 2002 or 2003, we had a real mess out there. Shortly after that, the increased enforcement came along, and that's given rise to an improved environment now—probably aided and abetted by the heightened ENGO interest in fisheries matters, the focus on sustainability, and so on. I don't think the kinds of horror stories that happened in the eighties and early nineties could really happen again. I can't see the European Union, for example, being able domestically to get away with what they did over here 15 or 20 years ago.
But having said that, goodwill is strained at best in NAFO. There are some who regard Canada as being greedy and trying to have it all for itself, and who don't think they're getting a fair shake out of NAFO. At best, it's an uneasy process to manoeuvre through.