Yes, that's a very technical legal question of ownership. I understand what you're saying.
I really can't say whether or not it would be a deal breaker to remove that clause from the proposed changes to the NAFO convention, because I haven't been privy to any of that discussion. But as I read it now, the document that all 12 countries have before them is the one they're working with and trying to ratify at their own Parliament. So I really can't honestly answer that. I don't know if Earle has heard anything to that effect either.