I don't think there were specifics on the observer issue, because as you say, they are representatives of the company. But in what we call the “shall” clause—having to come to port—the whole point is that if there isn't a certified NAFO inspector available to do a further investigation into what's perceived to be a wrong, that lack allows the complaining country, if I can use that term—Canada—to say that the boat has to come to port. The inspector must be a NAFO person, and at the port both of us, hopefully, can verify the information on what went on while on the water and what's stored in the boat.
There wasn't a big discussion, as I recall—maybe Earle can recall one—on observers; it was more on the inspectors and the NAFO enforcement process.