So what we have, then, is that this refugia is actually doing its job, but it's the only one in the entire area. If we were to take a look at the entire fishing area, whether it's up by the Gaspé, the îles-de-la-Madeleine, or wherever the case may be, one refuge or one place certainly wouldn't be indicative. If you take a look at any type of conservation plan or preservation plan, you're usually looking at anywhere from 12% to 20% of an area that should be left as a refuge in order to allow an opportunity for healthy stocks.
In the context of this report, then, and I guess necessity being the mother of invention, the reports submitted in 1995 and 2007 were under different economic times and different economic conditions. We're now in 2009. In these different economic conditions, do you feel that the recommendations in the reports are still just as valid today, considering the economic times, as they were in 2007 and 1995?