I don't think we pointed out who should share it, but it depends on what you're using it for. If it's to create a scientific index for management to deal with, then DFO management or DFO science should have to share some of the burden.
When you look at the value of the lobster industry to the tune of $600 million—not this year, say last year—it was around 110 million pounds of lobster. Two cents a pound brings you out to about $2.2 million. For two cents a pound on probably, at most times, a $5.50 to $6 lobster, you can create a nice, effective monitoring system that actually can give you size frequencies, landing data of what's landed, plus a check on what traps are in the water. If you're going to maximize the value out of the fishery, you nearly have to know what you have in the water to start with.
We go through it and blacklist our species, like on the islands, as of course you know. We pay so much for shrimp, so much for crab, and so much for everything that comes out of the water. That's because we have a quota system. It's a quota system. We started that way, and we've evolved to the point that you're trying to fine-tune every year. It exactly depends on what you want the information for. To my mind, that's where it's due.