To be clear, and just to reiterate what I said at the beginning, our role is to be an advisory council. Our role is to consult with the fishing industry, determine what is the best approach and way forward for 10 to 15 years down the road, and provide advice to the minister. Once we provide advice, the report is stand-alone. We don't debate or discuss or negotiate with the department or implement the report--not in any way, shape, or form.
Because we're involved in the fish business and the fishery, we understand that these plans are in place. The ones that you mean, the ones from the Maggies, I'll ask Donald to talk about.
Basically, when reports are provided to the minister publicly, then it's up to the department to implement them. We don't really have any attachment to the report other than discussing the report itself. We don't have any implementation power. We have lots of influence in how decisions...and how things continue, but we have zero decision power.