I'm amazed we know so much. You talk about the percentage of lobsters that reproduce below the minimum legal size, and we have all these stats. It's fascinating, yet we don't know about the lobster landings, and we're speculating, as page 13 of your report talks about, on the amount of biomass that's actually out there. That's what I find amazing. In your chart, from 1890 to 2010 you can almost draw a straight line from 1890 and you're back to the same. So intuitively that kind of suggests that the stocks are down.
What kinds of things have been recommended so we can get a better handle on that? One of the recommendations you made in your report was around improved indicators of stock size. What are the kinds of things that can be done to actually help us nail down what that stock size is and make the landings mean something?