Would you interpret that to mean that you wouldn't actually have an order of reference to study the snow crab issue until the aquaculture study is completed? That's the way I would read it.
The motion is very specific about timing and about when the crab study can occur. It cannot occur until after the west coast aquaculture study is completed. So in terms of the ability of this committee to use financial resources to call witnesses or to take other measures, you won't have that order of reference if this amended motion passes. That would be my interpretation.
I'd love to hear from those of a higher power. Maybe our clerk could say that I'm not reading this correctly. What would be your interpretation? May I ask the chair or the clerk to provide us with an interpretation?