Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Fin, just as a clarification, the motion has been amended but not adopted, so we are not yet decided to study crab at all in eastern Canada. That is subject still to a vote. The only thing we've voted on so far is the amended version of the motion.
It's a good thing that these meetings are recorded and transcripts provided, because Fin brought this forward. This is an issue that Fin brought forward because, quite frankly, there wasn't a huge amount of support from the government on a study of B.C. issues at all. That's not hearsay or conjecture; that's all fully recorded in the transcript of this committee when we were discussing this business. In fact, there is no motion to study aquaculture in B.C. There is an order of reference that tells us to call in the director general from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. That's it. There is no order of reference to study B.C. aquaculture yet, because there was no consensus on the part of the government members to do so. We'd actually have to engage in another motion to study B.C. aquaculture issues.
It's just so we're all clear. You know, there's a bit of revisionist history going on here.