First of all, everyone will have a turn to speak. If I say something that suits you, you don't say a word. If I say something that does not, you interrupt me. Is that how it works? I want to finish telling you what my thoughts are and then you will have an opportunity to express yours. You cannot interrupt me because you are not satisfied with what I am saying.
The problem is nevertheless the following. I am well aware that as far as the crab issue is concerned, I have the impression that we are heading towards a study that will take a certain amount of time. We will have to in any case determine how much time that will take. If not, as far as aquaculture is concerned, we will carry on meetings for a certain number of weeks and, at some point, we will realize that we will have to invite more witnesses. However, what I understand is that there are two major concerns: aquaculture in the west and crab in the east. In that regard, I believe that each one of the parties will have to present a work plan.
However, I cannot accept the amendment as it is currently presented that plans for a study on aquaculture in the west before studying the crab situation.