—it's not yours.
We saw that in Chile with the ag-lime disease, coming through the ag-lime into Chile. Enough said, perhaps, on that.
The second question was with regard to the quality of the fish. I'm probably the only person in the room who has had the luxury of eating land-base-raised coho and ocean-based coho. I can tell you that I couldn't tell the difference.
In other species, such as barramundi, which are delivered fresher to the market because they've been raised in good-quality water close to market, the quality of the raised fish is actually superior to wild fish, because you can go from tank to table in under two days, whereas if it's harvested in another part of the world and flown across the world, the fish quality goes off. That is true of the barramundi market.
Third, you put a question mark around the production of lettuce. Lettuce is only used here as a placeholder to illuminate the value of the waste in terms of two things: how much you can grow, and put a value on it. So there's a whole range of crops that you could grow on the back end of these farms. It doesn't have to be lettuce, but in this work, the bioproductivity from a pound of waste into what it means in terms of growth has been documented, articulated, for lettuce.
The economics, by the way, stand on their own without hydroponics, but why would you throw $4 million away every year when it's there to be had?
Was that the full set of questions?