I think the quota is going to be determined by the science. DFO is going to continue to do that. I think the way we have to move is that we have the same amount of quota as is dictated by DFO, but we have fewer people catching it.
The example I used before is that of somebody with a 35-foot boat, with just a small quota of 10,000 or 11,000 pounds, plus a small quota of cod and something of capelin. It's just not a viable living. However, if we can find a way such that this 35-foot boat would have two or three quotas of that size, then there is a reasonable living to be made in that.
I think the other thing we have to look at, as I've mentioned here, is a glut. All of our shrimp and our crab are caught in a very short period of time, so if we can find some way to spread that out then we'd have a longer work period for fish plant workers and, as well, we wouldn't be glutting the market.
The second thing that was put forward this year is some inventory financing, so that maybe we can hold the product on the market for a longer period of time, thus giving it a better price. Now, when we checked into it, of course we had legal opinions that said you could be struck with countervail and trade issues, so we didn't go there, but I still think there's merit to something along those lines as well.
Those are strategies that we can work on to ensure that we get a better price for the product and maintain the strength on the global market.