Can I interrupt you just for one second on that? To get to the point that if you have four years of an understanding, there are four years to correct that misunderstanding—if it's there. The test of a reasonable person would be that after four years there's an opportunity for DFO to correct a misunderstanding. Also, the point here is that if a change is being announced and if it's simply the status quo, what happened in 2005 in revisionist history is that there was never any change to the management plan; it was the 2004 plan rolled over again. Would that be a correct interpretation?
