I imagine that if the document in question has not been tabled, you will table it so that we can apprise ourselves of it. You only have to give it to the clerk as well as any document you have or any document you may wish to provide to us following today's meeting. If you believe that the members of the committee would be interested in such and such a document, do not be shy. Sometimes we think of certain things in the moment and the next day, we think of something else. Please do not hesitate in this regard.
There's another point I'd like to raise with you which is the minister's discretionary power, the 100% power. Certain people may say that this is interesting because it allows one to correct a mistake right up to the last minute. However, there are all sorts of levels of lobbying, of power. I wonder, in the final analysis, if there shouldn't be a type of power-sharing. We wouldn't want the minister or the people surrounding him or her to be able to do whatever they please. The same thing is true concerning the people who could possibly influence that person.
There could be a sort of multilateral committee where the people concerned by a particular problem could sit. I am raising this with you because this could eventually be one of our recommendations. I would like to know your opinion. Do you see this favourably, or not? If you think this is a good idea, why?