Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I also am having trouble, as my colleagues are, with understanding how the decision was made for this year and why, for instance, a similar decision wasn't made last year or earlier.
Mr. Bevan, in your remarks you referred to area 13. I think you referred to it as what we don't want to do. Could you explain a little bit about how and why decisions were made in area 13? Given your comments about the precautionary principle and how you would ideally manage with that principle taken into account, for such decisions as the recent decision, how is it in a case such as that of area 13, which you referred to, it wasn't taken into consideration?