I'd be very interested in knowing what the risk assessment and the scientific range was for last year and then why the TAC was set as it was last year versus this year, and why the drastic change in one year, when we're looking at a 10-year cycle, as you've mentioned and as we've heard at other hearings. That's something I'm certainly grappling with; it doesn't seem consistent.
I have one last question, but I guess I'll have to wait. Thank you.