I think that a crisis like the one we're going through today may be foreseeable. I think we'll be going through a crisis every 10 years. In fact, there won't be crises all the time, but there will always be a year when the biomass will be extremely low. For example, Mr. Moriyasu said this morning that, in 1995, the commercial crab biomass in the gulf was assessed at 150,000 tonnes. We had a quota of 20,000 or 22,000 tonnes. In those years, we were accumulating crab on the bottom: we fished it very little. However, in 1999, at the end of the cycle, the crab that had accumulated by hundreds of thousands of tonnes was dead. We had accumulated all that for nothing. We weren't able to fish it because it was dead. That's why, starting in the 2000s, everyone agreed that, in the next cycle, we would engage in slightly more intensive fishing. It's good for the economy because it provides work for people. It's good business.
At the end of the cycle, we realized that the levels were similar. If you compare the total biomass from 1999 to that in 2009, you'll definitely see that the 2009 level is slightly lower, but the levels are nevertheless similar. There's a difference of a few thousand tonnes, but it's nevertheless similar. I think that, in the period from 2009 to 2010, we fished for crab slightly more intensively—perhaps even too much so. I nevertheless think we were right to do so. If we had accumulated the resource, that doesn't mean that that crab would be at the bottom of the sea today—it might have all been dead.
I think that answers your question.