Gerry Byrne at the Fisheries and Oceans Committee

I'll direct this to Marc or Sylvain.

Would you take it then that complete coverage is better than partial coverage? Your earlier efforts were at 25,000 square kilometres of coverage, directed mostly at the strongest habitat areas or fishing effort areas, but you decided to expand that to 35,000 square kilometres. Whether or not an error was made, the bottom line is that the results dramatically changed. Would you say that bigger is better?