Yes, and your point is taken. We've seen these two cycles: a high peak and a lower peak. Maybe there's a potential that we'll be having a smaller peak in the future. Other fisheries have shown similar declining cyclical peaks. This is why we adopted the precautionary approach, by the way. This is one of the reasons we embarked on having limit reference points and having the cautious, healthy, and critical zones with defined stock levels, to try to avoid this kind of situation of cascading decline over the years. This is the objective, but that will have to be adjusted as we go along.
You have to realize that the science is evolving all the time. We're doing research not only on stock status, but also on sexual maturity and how many bearing females you need to produce a good healthy stock. That kind of research is going on, and will probably help in the future to better adjust that precautionary approach.