Over the years, we have seen stocks decline. Let's assume that we are confident about the accuracy of the data and that we are seeing a trend here. Certain things are noted the first year, but after the second and third years, we can see a trend emerging. Somewhere, someone decided to defy logic. If stocks decline for two or three years and then, all of a sudden, in 2010, a decision is made to cut the quota by 63%, it means that people did not really believe what was happening in previous years. This is where I have a problem with the department's logic. All of a sudden, it makes a decision on the strength of data it believes to be sound. While it knew the trend showed declining stocks, this year, it decided to take action.
