In a couple of points that have been made here today there have been very specific references to a certain stakeholder group. If you go back and read the original motion, it does not identify a specific stakeholder group. I want to make that point very clear, because there have been many references in the discussion today to it being very specific. It is not very specific. The only specific point made in the original motion is that “the Minister and relevant officials as well as stakeholder groups be called to testify”.
To be very frank with you, this is going to end up being a discussion of the subcommittee. It will be a discussion of the committee as a whole if this motion passes in its present state. I just don't want anybody to have any illusions here that by passing this motion, it lays forward a clear path for this committee, because it does not do that.
Does everybody understand that?
I am going to call the question on the subamendment.
Mr. Shory, you haven't had anything to say on the subject, but I will ask you to make your comments very brief.