I think part of what we're trying to do, as I mentioned earlier in my opening remarks, is to ensure that the industry becomes far more transparent.
One of the things the industry itself wants to be able to say to the market is that that they are in full compliance with all regulatory provisions and that people have inspected their operations regularly to prove that. They want to be able to point to a regular set of government inspections, visits, and so on, so they can say that the conservation and protection folks have been there on a regular basis and they had no violations--or they were very small or whatever it is.
We know from the industry perspective that there's a high degree of receptivity to doing this. Certainly expectations on us from the environmental community for regular visits and so on are very high. There are a whole pile of reasons for wanting to do that, so we will be on farms with some regularity.
I should point out as well that the discussion tends to focus primarily on the salmon farms. The inspection and regulatory provisions apply equally to shellfish operations, so we expect to be on shellfish beds and visiting shellfish farmers and so on. This is an area we'll focus some enforcement attention on, as well as in the salmon farming areas.
With respect to aquaculture, the presence of DFO on the water will be much more visible with respect to the conservation protection officers and the fisheries officers themselves. But what I would describe as the ongoing management personnel of the department will be much, much more present in the years to come, I think.