The regime in place in Alberta is essentially non-existent with respect to aquaculture. In Saskatchewan, a very small section of the fish and wildlife act deals with aquaculture, so it's very different. Manitoba is in the process of developing something similar. In Ontario, it's covered largely under their natural resources portfolio regime. There isn't something very specifically focused on aquaculture, so it's a little different.
In Quebec, there is no marine finfish regime, so there's no regulatory regime for that, but there is for shellfish. In New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, the nature of the regulations and legislation in place is similar to British Columbia, not identical. In Prince Edward Island, the federal government is already responsible for aquaculture across the province, so there's a different arrangement in place there. There's no aquaculture in Labrador, but in Newfoundland the regime is again not identical to British Columbia, but it's similar.
So you have a bit of variety across the country, because of course the country is different and the nature of aquaculture is different. For the most part, there is a legislative and regulatory system in Atlantic Canada that one could argue is similar to that of B.C. I wouldn't speculate as to where the courts would go if ever a challenge came, but the regime and the issues are no doubt somewhat similar.