It does today and it will in the future. Essentially what will happen is that we will, as I mentioned earlier, be working very closely with the province, using common criteria for decision-making. What we want to avoid is a scenario under which the province issues someone a lease and we come along and say, that's great, but we're not giving you a licence because that's just the wrong place for it. That's just stupid; it benefits nobody, and DFO never does it.
Essentially what we're working to do is make sure that the leasing and licensing provisions are synchronized carefully; that the criteria we use to determine whether or not someone would get a licence are factored into the leasing decision and vice versa. So whilst they are two legal documents with two legal tracks, we are working very hard to intersect them in an administrative way, if you will, so that we have built into the licensing decisions.... Obviously the focus there is on site base. Equally, we want to make sure that the province isn't issuing leases to areas where there is no possibility of getting a licence. We're going to be continuing to work with them to make sure that happens.
Is that clear enough? Have I answered that appropriately?