Of the ones that were not implemented, as far as we know, the forum recommended that a body independent of the natural resources agency and independent of DFO would be undertaken to have an oversight over this whole ecosystem approach, which marries marine planning with watershed planning. The forum felt that salmon were under threat as a result of a changing climate and continuing loss of ecological functionalities in watersheds because of human activities. It was so important to maintain a proper functioning ecosystem that a third-party, independent agency should keep an eye on what's going and report to the public, through the parliaments, the status of the health of both marine and freshwater ecosystems. As far as we know, that recommendation hasn't been acted upon at all.
The other one that we recommended, as I mentioned, was that money be set aside by the federal and provincial governments and industry to put together an independent panel to look at closed containment, come up with proper specifications for what closed containment should look like, help to invest in a pilot project, try it out and see whether it was functional and sustainable and economic in an ecological sense, and hopefully resolve once and for all whether closed containment was a long-term future for aquaculture. As far as we know, that investment hasn't taken place yet.