Let me just make sure; I want to understand this.
New funds were identified in 2008 to implement a national aquaculture strategy or a regulatory strategy. This decision did not come down until February 2009, initially. So what you're saying is the department actually anticipated that the court would move jurisdiction from the province to the feds, so that's why you put the money in place in 2008. Because if you're not saying that, were the original intentions of the 2008 aquaculture strategy and its funding...what's being taken away from that original intent to be able to meet these current-day challenges?