Yes. Closed containment is a deceptively simple term. It implies closed containment, right? But what closed containment can entail is a variety of systems. It can involve the production of fish on land in truly completely sealed off.... You could grow fish in this room with an appropriate tank and all that kind of stuff. Equally, it can involve systems that are in the water and have hard walls instead of an open net. Water still moves in and out of the system. In particular, the bio-matter in the water moves, so lice in particular can still come into a closed containment system and go back out again.
Closed containment is used to produce a variety of finfish at relatively small scales around the world today. It's not new technology in that respect. We're not aware of anywhere in the world that produces salmon at a commercial scale or even close to a commercial scale, both from a technological point of view and from a financial point of view. We're not aware of that being done anywhere today.
The department.... I shouldn't say just “the department”. The federal government has invested significantly in efforts to develop, improve, and support the development of closed containment technology. This has come through a variety of arms of the federal government. So by no means are we anti-closed-containment--far from it. Certainly, if that technology is the future of the industry and were it to evolve, we'd be very supportive of that. But I think that the current state of play is such that closed containment, at least as we see it, is not viable today or in the short-term foreseeable future.