if you put a whole bunch of animals in a confined space, the risk of disease goes up. Essentially what happened in Chile was that they adopted a production strategy that is dramatically different from that anywhere in Canada. The concentration of farms is extremely dense. Farms were not put in place with any biosecurity measures.
I've been to Chile four times on this job, and I've watched people actually do this: you could see people go literally from farm to farm to farm—carrying the mail, for example. That is illegal in Canada. When you get onto a farm in Canada, you have to dip your feet and all that kind of routine. It doesn't exist in Chile. So a lot of the biosecurity controls that you would expect to see are not bad: they are non-existent in Chile.
In the Canadian context, the biosecurity controls we have in place are much more rigid. We think the controls that are in place in British Columbia are solid. Touch wood again, but we have not had major disease outbreaks there. We have had in New Brunswick, and New Brunswick responded: the farm management dynamic and so on was changed. We think that has ended in a positive result.