I guess at this point we're very much focused on responding to the decision in British Columbia based on the facts in British Columbia and the current circumstance there. If an environmental group or any other organization were to move forward with a suit in other provinces that resulted in a similar result, we'd respond to it at that time. At this point we're certainly aware that what we do in British Columbia has potential implications elsewhere, but we are not at this point planning to develop a “British Columbia model”, if you will, and just plunk that down elsewhere. If the courts take us there, then government will have to respond.
On March 22nd, 2010. See this statement in context.