Justice Cohen's terms of reference do allow this on the science side, as I call it. He is asked to try to determine the reasons for the decline, to assess the current state of the stock, to look at its future, and to make recommendations. So it would be open to him, I think, to recommend that further work needs to be done in a particular area. But with the benefit of everything that DFO knows—because we've asked them to provide it, and they're required, under the terms, to provide us with all of the research that we seek from them—but also from other sources.... A number of parties have expressed direct interest in the aquaculture issue, so I anticipate that there will be other science provided. I also anticipate that commission counsel and the participants' counsel will have questions in cross-examination for DFO witnesses on this issue. I suspect the aquaculture will be a focus here.
