I too will supporting it. I think we'll get a good sample as to whether there are competing or conflicting ideas and views related to Pacific salmon. Albeit this is just an issue on lice per se, it gives the committee a sampling of whether there's unanimity or solidarity on these kinds of things. If there's not, then obviously it's a good indicator that maybe this is something the committee should delve into; if there is unanimity on this, this is probably an indication the committee could use its talents or time elsewhere.
So I'd heartily support this and see what the witnesses have to say.