I think it is safe to say that as opposed to other committees on the Hill, this is one that tends to have had a history of being not terribly partisan but dedicated to that task of preserving the fisheries.
I'm wondering, is the litigious nature of the forum, the fact that there's a judge who has subpoena powers, and lawyers—a profession in which I participate myself, or at least did—going to help or hinder, do you think, the gathering of evidence in terms of the overall objective here?