My only comment--and I may have an amendment as well--is to ask if we are going to do the eco-certification study, or are we transitioning into something else? That would be my only fear.
We decided we were going to go ahead with that and we heard some good testimony, mostly to get up to speed on the regulation-making process. Some other issues were raised with Trevor. I haven't heard the motion defended yet by Mr. Donnelly, other than what I see here, but I'm guessing that what happened was that Alexandra Morton heard the testimony and asked, through Mr. Donnelly, to appear before us. I'm guessing she plans to correct the record on something she heard; otherwise, I'm not sure what the point of this is. You can correct me if I'm putting words in your mouth, Fin.
Before I perhaps move an amendment to it, could I get some clarification on the point of this motion?