I couldn't tell you whether or not this specifically is something we're currently doing. I certainly will bring it back.
The need to trace seafood products--their source, what they are, what they're called, what they're not called--is certainly something that stems from different trade bans from ICs to other organizations. I know there are associated identification requirements from an international perspective that force countries to be able to identify products and what they are specifically.
Whether or not retailers and the people who sell fish have that requirement... I think through seafood culls for safety purposes, there have been an increased awareness and need by large retailers and food buyers to require a tracking and tracing of seafood all the way to its origin. I think that will increase. If you buy fish in Japan and have the piece of fish under a bar code, you can actually trace it all the way back to the individual captain of the boat--where it comes from.
Of course, seafood safety is particularly important in a country where they mostly eat their seafood raw, so I think this trend is also increasing. Certainly the European Union requirement to have the certificate about legality has forced the Canadian industry to track and trace their products up to a group of vessels. In order to be able to get the certificate from the Canadian government, from DFO, they need to supply the information electronically. This is forcing the industry to get organized and be able to track their products. I think it's also giving the Canadian industry a competitive edge compared to other countries, in terms of being able to demonstrate where their products are coming from.