Well, I go back to the first part of my comments where I said that the reasons were to introduce actual operating information and costs—actual energy costs, actual capital costs, actual market receptivity information—into this debate in British Columbia, which is quite a large debate about where closed-system aquaculture fits.
Now that's half of it. The other half of it, as I say, was to explore the benefits of providing larger fish to move into the ocean environment for our existing facilities. Think about it: We're growing 40,000 tonnes of salmon a year in net pens. We're building a pilot to provide information on 300 tonnes of production, which can be extrapolated to 2,500 tonnes. Everything we currently look at says it's going to cost more than being in the net pens, but we're committed to finding ways to move forward and understanding this discussion in a greater sense.
So how can we do something that blends finding out more about the full harvest size and aids our growing business in the ocean as well? That's basically the answer for you there.