I would say that we believe we have a very good number, because we've produced a bio-plan and determined the number of people needed to support that bio-plan.
Unlike in the case of engineering energy, for instance, where you can compute how many pumps you need to shift so many cubic metres of water per second, and it's a very accurate calculation, until you've actually run a farm and tripped over the fact that twice a week you have to sweep this place out, for instance.... The probability of unexpected activity is high. We do have a very good appreciation of what we think our labour will be, but until we've gone through that exercise we won't know, whereas you can compute precisely how much energy you're going to need because you know the amount of water and the pumps, etc.
I was putting out a note of caution there, but we have actually very carefully costed what we believe it will be. We believe we'll be in a profitable situation.
The question is, how profitable? That's the argument. Also, how susceptible will our premium pricing be to commodity variation in the marketplace? You have the price at the top wandering up and down. At the moment, the current price at Seattle, fresh on board, head on, gutted, is $2.9 per pound. That historically has peaked above $5. There is a highly volatile market on the commodity side.
Luckily, since we have gone to electricity on land, our electricity costs are very stable. They're not linked to propane, which follows oil in price.
So these are all variables we have to consider. The DFO model did a really good job of providing a tool through which you can enter numbers to explore all that. So I'm really confident that we'll be—