Thank you very much.
As we can read on page 29 of the department's feasibility study, experts in the field presume that the fish produced in these recirculating aquaculture systems will be worth more because these systems are considered biologically safer.
In your study, you say that the fish produced with these technologies will be worth 25% more, and you say maybe more in a footnote. Yet, in the department's study there is no mention of such a premium.
As organic products usually cost more, is it justified to say that the fish produced with these technologies has more value?