Right. I appreciate the distinction, and I think you're right on there.
But I think the agriculture-aquaculture analogy stands in many ways, because if we look back in human history, we started off as hunters and gatherers. As agriculture developed, our reliance on wild food diminished through the application of energy and labour, and we actually ended up in the situation we have now where we do not have to hunt wildlife to live. We've replaced it with agriculture.
Maybe I'll ask you to speculate. Perhaps this is not quite in your area of expertise, but it seems to me that with the world demand for seafood rising and the ability of wild fish to sustain that almost at its breaking point, economically sound and productive ocean aquaculture can substitute for the harvesting of wild fish, which is basically a form of hunting, and be a force for conservation of wild fish stocks.
Could you speculate on that?