Let me just say in response, though, that surely in the screening process those who are doing the screening are taking into account the actual size of the project. They're not pretending that it's 25,000 fish if it's a million. They're taking into account the impacts of that proposed project on the environment, the ecosystem, and so on. It sounds like you're saying they got it wrong, but we're not in a position to reach that conclusion.
Let me move on to another question. You talk about the question of traceability, and I understand your point there. Can you provide examples of the quality being tainted by proximity to an aquaculture operation elsewhere in Atlantic Canada?
In other words, your point is that if you put in an aquaculture operation, your lobster, which is of high value, is going to be devalued because now it's close to an aquaculture operation. Do you have examples of that from elsewhere?