In the case you referred to first, if an aquaculture operation breaks the rules, there could be some negative impacts. But I was asking if the lobster industry is experiencing this kind of negative impact from being close to an aquaculture operation.
Let me leave that and ask one more question. I know my colleague is going to ask you more specific questions about the science.
On your involvement with the court case—the judicial review of the decision, and so on—can you tell me what your end game is? I notice some similarity with the case that was launched in British Columbia. It ended up with the Supreme Court of B.C. saying that aquaculture was a fishery and needed to be managed by the federal government rather than the provincial government. Is that what you're hoping to achieve? If so, how do you see that helping your case in St. Mary's Bay?